為什麼这麼多银行关门？揭开金融转型背后的真相

近年来，无论在城市或乡村，银行关闭分行的消息频频出现在新闻标题中。不少人开始担心：这是银行财务出问题的徵兆，还是金融业转型的自然结果？

事实上，这一波银行关门潮，主要是由科技发展、经营策略转变，以及顾客使用习惯改变所驱动。以下，我们将深入解析银行為何纷纷关闭，以及这对我们每个人有何影响。

数位银行崛起，改变消费习惯

银行分行大量关闭的首要原因，是因為我们的银行方式改变了。

从手机App转帐、线上贷款申请，到ATM无卡取款，现代人越来越习惯透过数位方式处理日常金融业务。根据调查，高达七成以上的美国人首选数位银行服务。

随着分行来客量大幅下降，维持实体门市的高额成本逐渐难以负荷。像是U.S. Bancorp、富国银行（Wells Fargo）与美国银行（Bank of America）等大型银行，在2025年初就已关闭数十家分行。

成本效益与经营策略的考量

实体分行的营运成本极高——从租金、人事、水电到保全，每年可能要花费数十万美元。

因此，银行逐渐朝向整併分行、精简网络，将资源重新投入於数位建设、AI客服及资安防护。这一系列动作，并非危机处理，而是為了提升效率与竞争力。

谁被留下了？

然而，转型的代价也不可忽视。在偏乡与低资源社区，实体分行的关闭意味着金融可及性的减少。

以澳洲昆士兰為例，有些小镇已完全没有任何银行据点。类似的情况也发生在美国与英国的乡村地区，年长者、小商户，以及缺乏网路设备的居民首当其冲。

那麼银行是否真的「倒闭」了？

需要强调的是，「分行关闭」与「银行倒闭」是两码事。

目前关门的多数是经营正常的银行分行，而不是整家银行的破產倒闭。2025年截至目前，美国仅有两家小型银行倒闭，其中包括位於德州的 Santa Anna National Bank，主因為资產管理不善与涉嫌诈骗。

整体而言，银行体系仍然稳健且资本充足，民眾无需过度恐慌。

Why Are So Many Banks Closing? Understanding The Shifting Financial Landscape

In recent years, headlines about banks shuttering branches have become increasingly common—from major cities to rural communities. The wave of closures has prompted concern and confusion: Is this a sign of financial instability, or simply a transformation of how we bank?

The truth lies in a mix of technology, cost-cutting strategies, and shifting customer habits. Here’s a closer look at what’s really driving the trend—and what it means for everyday consumers.

⸻

📱 Digital Banking Is Leading the Way

The number one reason for bank closures? We’re banking differently.

From mobile apps to online transfers, today’s customers are doing more financial transactions digitally than ever before. According to recent data, over 70% of Americans prefer digital banking as their primary method. As foot traffic declines, maintaining costly physical branches no longer makes economic sense—especially for large banks that can offer full services online.

U.S. Bancorp, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America, for instance, have collectively closed dozens of branches in early 2025 alone.

⸻

💸 Cost Efficiency and Corporate Strategy

Brick-and-mortar branches are expensive. Between rent, staffing, security, and maintenance, the average physical branch can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars per year to operate.

Banks are increasingly consolidating services—shutting down underused locations and reinvesting in digital infrastructure, AI support, and fraud prevention technologies. In this way, closures are less about crisis, and more about efficiency.

⸻

🏡 Communities Left Behind

The shift, however, isn’t painless. In small towns and underserved communities, where high-speed internet or tech-savvy access may be limited, losing a local branch can mean losing vital financial access.

In Queensland, Australia, for example, entire towns have been left without any physical bank presence. Similar concerns have arisen in rural America and in the U.K. where elderly residents, small business owners, and those without internet access face new hurdles.

⸻

🏦 What About Bank Failures?

It’s important to distinguish between branch closures and bank failures.

While hundreds of branches are closing, only a very small number of banks are failing—usually due to poor financial management or fraud. In 2025, the U.S. has seen only two small bank failures so far, including Santa Anna National Bank in Texas, which regulators shut down due to alleged fraud and insolvency.

These are isolated cases and not indicative of widespread banking collapse. In fact, overall, the banking system remains stable and well-capitalized.