點擊瀏覽 休斯頓黃頁 電子書
美南廣場 / 董事長介紹

我們期望中美關係回暖


我們期望中美關係回暖
我們期望中美關係回暖

從對抗到對話,美中關係是否將迎來轉機?

自2025年初重返白宮後,前總統唐納·川普展開一系列出人意表的外交舉措,其中尤以對中國大陸的關係調整最為引人注目。曾以激烈貿易戰與科技封鎖為主軸的川普,如今卻頻頻釋出善意,試圖與北京重啟對話。這一策略轉變,無疑透露出其對國際格局與國內經濟戰略的再思考。

領導人通話:互動升溫的信號

2025年6月5日,川普與中國國家主席習近平舉行了一場歷時約一個半小時的電話會談,這是雙方在川普復任總統後的首次正式溝通。會談重點聚焦於經貿議題,雙方同意在日內瓦會談所達成的暫時性協議基礎上,進一步推動實質磋商,並初步考慮互派高層訪問。這場通話標誌著兩國互動正在由“對抗冷淡”邁向“理性接觸”的新階段。

關稅政策鬆動:從強硬到務實

川普向來以“美國優先”為外交口號,在第一任期曾對中國發動關稅戰,重創全球供應鏈。然而,在其最新一輪政策中,美國針對中國的關稅措施出現一定程度的鬆動。自4月起,川普實施所謂“解放日”關稅政策,對全球約60國加徵10%基礎關稅,但與中國則達成臨時協議,雙方對彼此商品的平均關稅暫時調降,並設立90天休戰期。

這一政策不僅顯示美方在貿易上的戰略靈活性,也反映出對國內經濟與通膨壓力的現實回應。中國方面則配合調整稀土與新能源產品的出口政策,作為外交誠意的具體展現。

外交主動權:川普願赴陸會晤習近平

川普在媒體採訪中主動表示,“我當然會”親赴中國,與習近平面對面商談經貿與全球戰略議題。此一表態不僅出乎外界預料,也為中美兩國關係帶來新的想像空間。儘管白宮內部對此尚有不同聲音,但川普個人的外交積極度無疑為中美互動增添了更多可能性。

戰略算計:反向尼克松與地緣平衡

有分析認為,川普正在實施一種“反向尼克松”戰略:過去美國藉由接近中國牽制蘇聯,如今則可能透過與俄羅斯改善關係,反向制衡北京。在烏俄戰爭局勢膠著、美歐齟齬頻仍的當下,川普試圖以新的大國聯盟重塑全球地緣格局,中美關係的“鬆”與“緊”也成為其中關鍵一環。

結語:對抗與合作之間的試探

川普試圖改善與中國大陸的關係,並非單純出於友好考量,而是源自經濟現實與地緣博弈的重新權衡。在全球經濟放緩、美國內部政治撕裂日益嚴重的背景下,中美兩國若能在有限的空間內實現“鬥而不破”、“競爭中合作”,或許能為世界局勢帶來一絲喘息的機會。

然而,改善之路並不平坦。從科技封鎖到台灣問題,從人權議題到軍事部署,雙方矛盾依舊深層。川普的“試圖”是否能真正轉化為“成果”,仍需時間觀察,也取決於北京方面是否願意對等回應。

在這場權力與理性交織的角力中,中美關係的未來,仍在雲霧中等待破曉。



Trump’s Attempts To Mend Ties With Mainland China

From Confrontation To Communication — Is A U.S.-China Reset Underway?

Since returning to the White House in early 2025, President Donald Trump has launched a series of unexpected diplomatic moves, chief among them a strategic shift in his approach toward mainland China. Once known for igniting a fierce trade war and leading a technological decoupling effort, Trump is now extending a long overdue olive branch — signaling a desire to restart dialogue and stabilize bilateral ties. This pivot reveals a new calculation shaped by shifting global dynamics and domestic economic pressures.

Leadership Dialogue: A Sign of Thawing Relations

On June 5, 2025, Trump held a 90-minute phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping — their first direct communication since Trump’s return to office. The conversation centered on trade and economic cooperation, with both leaders agreeing to build upon temporary understandings reached during the Geneva consultations. A potential exchange of high-level visits was also floated, marking a cautious, but notable shift, from “strategic hostility” to “rational engagement.”

Trade Truce: From Tariff Firepower to Practical Flexibility

Trump’s first term was marked by high-stakes tariff battles with China that disrupted global supply chains and soured bilateral trust. But in 2025, his trade strategy appears more calibrated. In April, Trump introduced the so-called “Liberation Day” tariffs, imposing a 10% baseline duty on imports from over 60 countries. Yet in contrast, the U.S. and China reached a temporary agreement to ease their mutual tariffs, initiating a 90-day trade ceasefire.

China reciprocated with policy adjustments on rare earth exports and green energy materials, sending a clear signal of its willingness to deescalate. These mutual concessions suggest a shared recognition that confrontation must give way — at least temporarily — to pragmatism.

Diplomatic Gestures: Trump Signals Willingness to Visit China

In media interviews, Trump declared he would “certainly” consider visiting China to meet with Xi in person — an unexpected message from a president once known for his hawkish tone on Beijing. Though the idea has sparked internal debate within the White House, Trump’s personal willingness to engage directly with China at the highest level reflects a calculated diplomatic openness.

Strategic Realignment: The “Reverse Nixon” Doctrine?

Some analysts describe Trump’s evolving foreign policy as a “Reverse Nixon” strategy — recalling how Richard Nixon once engaged China to counterbalance the Soviet Union. Today, Trump appears to be doing the opposite: exploring détente with Russia to strategically pressure China. As the Ukraine war drags on and tensions rise with NATO, Trump may be recalibrating America’s great power playbook with U.S.-China relations playing a central role in that realignment.

Conclusion: A Test of Will and Wisdom

Trump’s attempt to improve relations with China is not driven by goodwill alone, but by the reality of economic interdependence and shifting global power structures. As the U.S. grapples with inflation, geopolitical fatigue, and internal division, Trump seems to be testing whether Washington and Beijing can coexist in a framework of “competitive coexistence” rather than perpetual hostility.

Still, the road to reconciliation is far from smooth. Deep-seated tensions remain over tech restrictions, Taiwan, human rights, and military posturing. Whether Trump’s overtures will bear tangible results remains uncertain — and largely depends on how China responds to this recalibrated American stance.

In this complex contest of strength and statesmanship, the future of U.S.-China relations continues to unfold in the seemingly perpetual fog — waiting, perhaps, for the first light of a new dawn.